On 2012-05-07 19:20, Michael Dürig wrote:
On 7.5.12 18:03, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2012-05-07 18:50, Michael Dürig wrote:
IIUC this is a slight change in semantics introduced by the underlying
MVCC model. I created OAK-14 a while ago to document such issues. I
suggest to add a test case to
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.CompatibilityIssuesTest to document this
change in behaviour.
Michael
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-14
...
True, but it is a conforming behavior per JCR, right? Thus I believe the
test needs to be fixed...
Not sure. Aren't both behaviours conforming? But it be more conforming
;-) when the test does an explicit refresh.
Michael
Yes, sorry for the confusion. Both are conforming.
