i create a task at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-752
in order to remind us of this.
regards
angela
On 4/5/13 10:28 AM, Michael Dürig wrote:
AFAIR the code mainly left there as a baseline while we switched to the
new index implementation "p2". If it is still necessary for that I'm ok
with keeping it longer. But we should definitely remove it from oak-core
before we go 1.0. Maybe we should open an issue with the an 1.0 target
so we don't forget.
Michael
On 4.4.13 18:25, Angela Schreiber wrote:
hi
there is still quite some code left that is has "old"
in it's package name and/or is deprecated
is this code really still in use? why? if not, what is
the reason for not removing it? as stated below, i
don't see any compelling reason why we should ship
a new repo implementation with code that is already
outdated.
kind regards
angela
On 1/24/13 2:42 PM, Angela Schreiber wrote:
hi devs
i recently came across quite some new oak code that has
already been marked deprecated... for example the old
index implementations.
would it be possible to get rid of those deprecated classes
and methods? since OAK is a completely new repository
implementation i don't see why we should have deprecated
stuff in the very first official release...
what do you think?
angela
