Hi, On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Thomas Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > ...I think it would be a pity if we would have to add ActiveMQ/RabbitMQ to > Oak, as it would increase implementation and configuration complexity > quite a lot...
Note that I was suggesting that *for large clusters*. Having a simple self-contained setup a la runnable jar for small/demo/test/development instances is great, but I don't think it's a problem for a large cluster to require more tools to perform. I'm also not sure if adding the right tools increases implementation complexity - it's rather delegating hard stuff to projects which have already solved those issues. -Bertrand
