Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Alex Parvulescu <[email protected]> wrote: > it looks like the latest uuid changes turned this into illegal code: > > if (testRootNode.hasNode(nodeName1)) { > testRootNode.getNode(nodeName1).remove(); > } > testRootNode.addNode(nodeName1, NodeType.NT_RESOURCE); > > And adding a #save call right after the #remove fixes the issue. > > I think the uuid validation bits need to cover this case more carefully.
Good catch! See my comment on OAK-823. BR, Jukka Zitting
