Hi, On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, good to know. I guess we should increase the limit to something > like -XX:MaxPermSize=48m to allow for the increased size of the > codebase (especially the upgrade test is demanding as it uses both Oak > and Jackrabbit) but still keep it low enough to capture potential > permgen leaks.
Done in revision 1504450. BR, Jukka Zitting
