On 10/29/13 1:46 AM, "Jukka Zitting" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi, > >On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Tobias Bocanegra <[email protected]> >wrote: >> I would rather keep the support for same name properties and nodes in >> order to ensure backward compatibility for existing repositories. > >I tend to agree. There don't seem to be too many benefits to keeping >the current design, and the backwards compatibility aspect might well >be a real problem for existing deployments. same here. if we can easily avoid breaking backwards compatibility we should reconsider our previous decision. angela
