just one more addition:

IMHO it was fairly straight forward to implement the server side
part of the jcr-remoting based on OAK. that would fit pretty much what
was always listed as 'native' implementation in the jackrabbit
documentation (and which was always marked with a dotted lined).
that was for sure much better than having yet another JCR layer
on the server side.

angela

On 12/2/13 12:38 PM, "Jukka Zitting" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Tobias Bocanegra <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>> so this means, that the SPI as we had it in Jackrabbit 2.x does no
>> longer exist. And that if we want to continue to support remoting via
>> DavEx (for example) users need to use the (client) code from
>> Jackrabbit.
>
>Exactly.
>
>BR,
>
>Jukka Zitting

Reply via email to