Hi,

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Alex Parvulescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shouldn't these changes go into trunk directly? I only see then on the new
> branch.
no, they are in trunk. I added them here:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1560563

> Second, I did not see any kind of discussion/announcement related to this
> new branch. We create releases every 2 weeks, couldn't this have waited a
> few days?

as i mentioned before. it's not a branch nor a tag of an official
release, but merely a place to record that I intended to use a 0.15.2
version of oak-core. I could have done it in my private fork, but
didn't. As soon as 0.16 is released, I delete the tag again.

regards, toby


> best,
> alex
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Tobias Bocanegra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:08 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> creating tag for oak-core 0.15.2 with modified manifest entries
>> >
>> > Are we releasing 0.15.2?
>>
>> No. I just needed an updated oak-core jar that contained a slightly
>> different MANIFEST.MF for exported packages that I forgot to include
>> in the official 0.15 release. And I thought it's best if I record this
>> change as non-released oak tag. I don't think we ever need to release
>> 0.15.2++ officially. but if we do, we need to create a 0.15 branch
>> anyways and then release 0.15.4.
>>
>> The alternative would have been to create a release my own fork...but
>> this would have not been as transparent, in case we really need to
>> release 0.15.x.
>>
>> regards, toby
>>
>> >
>> > BR,
>> >
>> > Jukka Zitting
>>

Reply via email to