Hi,

I think the test relies too much on timing and can fail if
some code needs more time to execute or GC kicks
in at an unfortunate time.

I created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1365

Regards
 Marcel 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Dienstag, 28. Januar 2014 17:00
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: new test failures
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> with the current trunk, I occasionally get the test failure below
> (oak-core):
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Test set: org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.RevisionTest
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.112
> sec <<< FAILURE!
> difference(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.RevisionTest)
> Time elapsed: 0.034 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError
>       at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:54)
>       at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.RevisionTest.difference(Revisio
> nTest.java:55)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.j
> ava:39)
>       at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
> sorImpl.java:25)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>       at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(Framework
> Method.java:45)
>       at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.jav
> a:15)
>       at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(Framework
> Method.java:42)
>       at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMeth
> od.java:20)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
>       at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.j
> ava:68)
>       at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.j
> ava:47)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
>       at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
>       at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
>       at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
>       at
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:
> 53)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Prov
> ider.java:123)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java
> :104)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.j
> ava:39)
>       at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
> sorImpl.java:25)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(Refl
> ectionUtils.java:164)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(Pr
> oviderFactory.java:110)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireSt
> arter.java:172)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcessWhen
> Forked(SurefireStarter.java:104)
>       at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:7
> 0)
> 
> 
> Is it just me?
> 
> Best regards, Julian

Reply via email to