Hi, On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Angela Schreiber <[email protected]> wrote: > would we in this case still have the need for Root#copy? > wouldn't it be better then to just drop that and build > Workspace#copy in oak-jcr altogether?
That would make sense, yes. The only case I can see for not doing this would be having an Oak-based non-JCR repository that doesn't need to worry about things like access control, versioning or locking. Such a repository could benefit from a copy-by-reference operation, but for now I'd be happy to drop the feature at the Oak level and only restore it if/when a new use case comes along. BR, Jukka Zitting
