ok, thanks Angela for the clarification :-) Tommaso
2014-03-05 8:48 GMT+01:00 Angela Schreiber <[email protected]>: > hi tommaso > > but that's something completely different... the query you are referring > to below looks for a user or group whose principalName matches everyone. > no access control involved this time ;-) > > regards > angela > > On 05/03/14 08:19, "Tommaso Teofili" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >also as far as I could see just yesterday, rep:AccessControllable is > >searched when logging in (I was logging into Felix WebConsole on a system > >running Sling and Oak and the query was "SELECT * FROM [rep:Authorizable] > >WHERE [rep:principalName] = $principalName, path=*, > >property=[rep:principalName=everyone]"), I was kind of surprised but > >that's > >what I found out. > > > >Regards, > >Tommaso > > > > > >2014-03-05 1:58 GMT+01:00 Jukka Zitting <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Tobias Bocanegra <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > which brings the question, why we index those node types in the first > >> > place? I doubt that anyone will search for internal node types. > >> > >> I remember myself searching at least for rep:AccessControllable on > >> various occasions. It's a quick and easy way to locate ACLs within a > >> repository. > >> > >> > shouldn't we exclude all rep:* nodetypes? > >> > >> I think the conflict you're seeing should rather be fixed in some other > >> way. > >> > >> BR, > >> > >> Jukka Zitting > >> > >
