Removed the method with 1716101 Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Michael Dürig <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 24.11.15 10:09 , Chetan Mehrotra wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Michael Dürig <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'd rather remove the method and break backward compatibility at compile >>> time instead of runtime. >> >> >> Can do that but then would need to bump the major version of the stats >> package. Would that be fine? > > > I'd say yes, even when leaving the method in. While the signature stays > backward compatible, the semantic is quite different. > >> >> I missed marking this one as deprecated so would that needs to be done. > > > @deprecate would be an alternative. But then I'd just log a warning should > the method be called instead of throwing. > > Michael
