[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13456851#comment-13456851
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-304:
--------------------------------------
While we are at it. Can we also clarify the JavaDoc and have it talk about
consistency requirements/guarantees? The current MicroKernel implementation
guarantee the latest root in a strict sense. But is this a requirement? Would
it be OK for an implementation to provide eventual consistency here? That is,
getLatestRoot() might not immediately return the latest root created by another
session.
> Rename ContentSession.getCurrentRoot()
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-304
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-304
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Thomas Mueller
> Assignee: Thomas Mueller
> Attachments: OAK-304.patch
>
>
> Renaming the method would make it clear that the method is potentially
> expensive and the returned object reflects the head of the repository at the
> time the method is called.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
