[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13716212#comment-13716212
]
Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-767:
-----------------------------------
I'm actually not entirely sure what's the best approach here, to go with full
backwards compatibility with Jackrabbit or stick with the approach mentioned
above (with documentation about the difference).
A good example of the difference is in
{{AccessControlManagerTest.testRemoveMixin()}} where the (reasonable)
expectation is that removing the {{rep:AccessControllable}} mixin will cause
the protected {{rep:policy}} node to be removed, even if such a child node
would still be valid given that the parent node is of type {{nt:unstructured}}.
> Implement Node#removeMixin
> --------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-767
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-767
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: core, jcr
> Reporter: angela
> Assignee: Jukka Zitting
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
