[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13716389#comment-13716389
]
angela commented on OAK-928:
----------------------------
most probably this is related... i would consider "this" to be the root cause
and the OAK-869 being blocked by this one
as it only refers to Node#addNode. the same however is true for accessing,
adding and modifying properties.
> Read access is enforced on NEW items
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-928
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-928
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: angela
>
> as explained in OAK-923 we may currently run into the situation where a new
> Tree is being added because it does not exist but the resulting child does
> not exist due to restricted access. the same is true for new properties.
> IMHO this breaks backwards compatibility with jackrabbit core.
> i would therefore suggest to
> - extend MutableTree#exists by checking for the tree being new
> line 390:
> {noformat}
> - return nodeBuilder.exists();
> + return nodeBuilder.isNew() || nodeBuilder.exists();
> {noformat}
> - similar behavior for #hasProperty #getProperty, #getProperties and
> #getPropertyCount (no patch yet).
> however, i would like to get a broader consensus on this kind of
> modifications as this
> might have side effects in other places.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
