[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13821535#comment-13821535
 ] 

Jukka Zitting edited comment on OAK-1178 at 11/13/13 5:06 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

bq. simplified version

Yes, that definitely makes sense. I think the current {{isNew()}} code dates 
back to the time before we had the {{exists()}} mechanism, which makes it so 
convoluted.



was (Author: jukkaz):
bq: simplified version

Yes, that definitely makes sense. I think the current {{isNew()}} code dates 
back to the time before we had the {{exists()}} mechanism, which makes it so 
convoluted.


> MutableTree#isNew: replace implementation by NodeBuilder#isNew 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-1178
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1178
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: angela
>            Assignee: Jukka Zitting
>             Fix For: 0.12
>
>         Attachments: OAK-1178.patch
>
>
> Similar to the issue described in OAK-1177 we may consider replacing the 
> implementation of MutableTree#isNew by the corresponding call on the 
> NodeBuilder.
> See also OAK-947.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to