[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13957677#comment-13957677
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-1661:
------------------------------------
Note that using the info map for this purpose will make the TCK fail for
{code}
org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.observation.GetInfoTest#testNodeAdded
org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.observation.GetInfoTest#testNodeRemoved
{code}
I suggest we ignore these failures as the tests seem overly aggressive in their
expectations.
> JCR Event Info should contain NodeType for Events Type Node-Deleted
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-1661
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1661
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: jcr
> Affects Versions: 0.19
> Reporter: Christan Keller
> Assignee: Michael Dürig
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.20
>
>
> Code developped for Jackrabbit's Observation often struggle with processing
> events for deleted Nodes.
> Processing like for aggregation may depend on the type of the deleted Node.
> The solution to take a Nodetype filter could be prevented or some reasons.
> Adding the node-type to the Event's Info object would help in this cases.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
