[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14224293#comment-14224293
]
Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-2287:
--------------------------------------
bq. changeChangedProperty
do you mean _ changeDeletedProperty_?
I'm not exactly sure what to say here. Does delegating merge the property or
does it generate a conflict?
I would probably cover _ deleteDeletedProperty_ here (no conflict needed), and
would delegate for the other delete+change combinations as per your suggestion.
> ConflictHandler for merging jcr:lastModified
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-2287
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2287
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core, jcr
> Reporter: Alex Parvulescu
> Assignee: Alex Parvulescu
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OAK-2287.patch
>
>
> As discussed on oak-dev, 'jcr:lastModified' is a date property and it
> represents the last modification date. It makes sense to merge concurrent
> updates by picking the newer date of the 2 options.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
