[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14224327#comment-14224327
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-2287:
------------------------------------
bq. do you mean _ changeDeletedProperty_?
Yes, this is a typo.
Delegating in those cases will generate a conflict. The reason I'm bringing
this up is because such conflicts are not specific to {{jcr:lastModified}} and
should probably best left to other handlers. The JCR specification is in some
parts quite picky here: it specifically mandates a conflict for the
{{deleteDeletedProperty}} case and even covers this in the TCK:
{{o.a.j.test.api.NodeTest#testRemoveInvalidItemStateException}}.
> ConflictHandler for merging jcr:lastModified
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-2287
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2287
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core, jcr
> Reporter: Alex Parvulescu
> Assignee: Alex Parvulescu
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OAK-2287.patch
>
>
> As discussed on oak-dev, 'jcr:lastModified' is a date property and it
> represents the last modification date. It makes sense to merge concurrent
> updates by picking the newer date of the 2 options.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
