[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14902186#comment-14902186
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-3434:
--------------------------------------
bq. There seem to be clients of the org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security package
that extend SecurityProviderImpl
Do we have clients or its just because bnd thinks we are breaking backward
compatibility? Extending OSGi components would anyway not work easily.
> Revert backwards-incompatible changes to SecurityProviderImpl
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-3434
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3434
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
> Reporter: Francesco Mari
> Assignee: Francesco Mari
> Fix For: 1.3.7
>
> Attachments: OAK-3434-01.patch
>
>
> OAK-3201 introduced some backwards-incompatible changes to
> {{SecurityProviderImpl}}. It should be investigated if those changes can be
> reverted to maintain the backwards compatibility of the
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security}} package.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
