[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14902237#comment-14902237
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-3434:
--------------------------------------
Just for the record - From what I know extending OSGi component does not work.
So in an OSGi setup if a customer is extending SecurityProvider I do not see
how it worked so far. Assuming it worked then also its hard to see how it
worked as then you would still have 2 security providers as extending would not
cause the first one to be disabled. So it would have been good to first have a
test case which can demonstrate this problamatic scenario and then have a fix.
> Revert backwards-incompatible changes to SecurityProviderImpl
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-3434
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3434
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
> Reporter: Francesco Mari
> Assignee: Francesco Mari
> Fix For: 1.3.7
>
> Attachments: OAK-3434-01.patch
>
>
> OAK-3201 introduced some backwards-incompatible changes to
> {{SecurityProviderImpl}}. It should be investigated if those changes can be
> reverted to maintain the backwards compatibility of the
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security}} package.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
