[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14956521#comment-14956521
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-3505:
--------------------------------------
Looks good. Couple of points
* Prefix system property names with {{oak}} so
{{IndexUpdate.ignoreReindexFlags}} -> {{oak.indexUpdate.ignoreReindexFlags}}
* Should we change the default value also for {{failOnMissingIndexProvider}} to
true such that reindex flag is not set automatically. Gives a more comfortable
feeling ;). Or are there any downsides to that
> Provide an optionally stricter policy for missing synchronous index editor
> providers
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-3505
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3505
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Alex Parvulescu
> Assignee: Alex Parvulescu
> Attachments: OAK-3505-v2.patch, OAK-3505.patch
>
>
> Currently a missing synchronous index editor provider will mark the specific
> index type with a reindex flag (OAK-3366). I'd like to provide the option to
> setup a strategy to fail the commit until a specific impl comes online.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
