[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14956667#comment-14956667
]
Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-3505:
--------------------------------------
bq. Prefix system property names with oak so IndexUpdate.ignoreReindexFlags ->
oak.indexUpdate.ignoreReindexFlags
makes sense.
bq. Should we change the default value also for failOnMissingIndexProvider to
true such that reindex flag is not set automatically. Gives a more comfortable
feeling . Or are there any downsides to that
I would not jump on changing the default behavior without allowing for some
time to understand the side effects of this change.
> Provide an optionally stricter policy for missing synchronous index editor
> providers
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-3505
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3505
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Alex Parvulescu
> Assignee: Alex Parvulescu
> Attachments: OAK-3505-v2.patch, OAK-3505.patch
>
>
> Currently a missing synchronous index editor provider will mark the specific
> index type with a reindex flag (OAK-3366). I'd like to provide the option to
> setup a strategy to fail the commit until a specific impl comes online.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
