[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15383749#comment-15383749
 ] 

Andrei Dulceanu commented on OAK-4097:
--------------------------------------

I'd like some advice regarding how to approach this issue. One way would be to 
add a {{{FileStoreMonitor}}} instance variable in {{{TarRevisions}}} and have a 
new {{{FileStoreMonitor::flushed()}}} method being called at each 
{{{TarRevisions::flush()}}} invocation. IMO this would satisfy the requirement, 
since {{{TarRevisions::flush()}}} is the only place where a journal write 
happens.

On the other hand, as suggested by [~frm], we could intercept calls to 
{{{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.WriteOperationHandler::flush()}}} "since 
this method guarantees that pending changes in in-memory segments are persisted 
on disk via a write." I think this is a more general approach, but since 
{{{WriteOperationHandler::flush()}}} is called in {{{SegmentWriter::flush()}}} 
which in turn is called in numerous places (including {{{FileStore::flush()}}} 
which causes also the journal write), without necessarily modifying the journal 
file, I'd assume the metric collected would be one related to {{{FileStore}}} 
writes, not to journal writes.

Any ideas on how to move this forward?

> Add metric for FileStore journal writes
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-4097
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4097
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: segment-tar
>            Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>            Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.6, Segment Tar 0.0.6
>
>
> TarMK flush thread should run every 5 secs and flush the current root head to 
> journal.log. It would be good to have a metric to capture the number of runs 
> per minute
> This would help in confirming if flush is working at expected frequency or 
> delay in acquiring locks is causing some delays



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to