[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15584979#comment-15584979
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-4938:
-------------------------------------
Sounds right to me. But in that case, we probably should add tests that ensure
that DS implementations do the same thing (ignore set operations on _id? reject
them?)
> clarify contract for UpdateOp with missing operation on _id
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-4938
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4938
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: documentmk
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Assignee: Julian Reschke
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: technical_debt
> Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> See OAK-4937
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
