[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15584994#comment-15584994
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-4938:
---------------------------------------
Yes, additional tests should verify this new behaviour. I think it would be
better to reject them with an exception.
> clarify contract for UpdateOp with missing operation on _id
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-4938
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4938
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: documentmk
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Assignee: Julian Reschke
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: technical_debt
> Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> See OAK-4937
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)