[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15584994#comment-15584994
 ] 

Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-4938:
---------------------------------------

Yes, additional tests should verify this new behaviour. I think it would be 
better to reject them with an exception.

> clarify contract for UpdateOp with missing operation on _id
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-4938
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4938
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: documentmk
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Assignee: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: technical_debt
>             Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> See OAK-4937



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to