[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15584994#comment-15584994 ]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-4938: --------------------------------------- Yes, additional tests should verify this new behaviour. I think it would be better to reject them with an exception. > clarify contract for UpdateOp with missing operation on _id > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OAK-4938 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4938 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: documentmk > Reporter: Julian Reschke > Assignee: Julian Reschke > Priority: Minor > Labels: technical_debt > Fix For: 1.6 > > > See OAK-4937 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)