[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16171358#comment-16171358
 ] 

Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-6318:
-----------------------------------

bq. there is a typo
oh no, and I checked it like 5 times :)

bq. shall we move this effort to a git fork where we could work both and try to 
sort it out first without breaking the build
yes we can do that. I wanted to get the small stuff sorted before the big 
breaking changes (tree package). I think we could sync efforts with OAK-6665, 
not sure about [~mreutegg]'s plans, but he'll probably also have to deal with 
this soon.

> Refactor oak.spi.security into a separate module/bundle
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-6318
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6318
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: core, security
>            Reporter: angela
>         Attachments: PropInfo.patch
>
>
> In the light of the modularization effort it would IMHO make a lot of sense 
> to refactor _oak.spi.security.*_ into a separate module/bundle that could be 
> release independent of _oak-core_.
> As far as I could see so far this is currently not easily doable due to the 
> dependency of {{oak.spi.security.*}} on {{oak.plugins.tree}}, which in turn 
> relies on {{o.a.j.oak.query.QueryEngineSettings}} and other oak-core 
> internals (see also OAK-6304). Most likely this issue would therefore require 
> a complete review (and possibly a split) of  the {{oak.plugins.tree}} package 
> space which contains a mixture of utilities and 'API' (like e.g. 
> {{TreeContext}} and {{TreeLocation}})... will open a separate issue for this 
> linking to this one.
> cc: [~alex.parvulescu], [~rombert], [~mduerig], [~tmueller]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to