[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16490457#comment-16490457
 ] 

Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-7510:
-----------------------------------

It seems the toughest problem to crack was the InitialContent#INITIAL_CONTENT 
used (only?) in testing. this seems to be producing an inconsistent 
'jcr:system' node (missing 'rep:privileges') by default.
there's also a few more interesting cases I'll document next.

> Run repository initializers with hooks
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-7510
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7510
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Alex Deparvu
>            Assignee: Alex Deparvu
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently the repository initializers (RepositoryInitializer and 
> WorkspaceInitializer) run when the repo boots without any hooks [0] which 
> means that current RepositoryInitializers need to setup custom Roots (roots 
> with hardcoded editor providers like NamespaceEditorProvider and 
> TypeEditorProvider) on top of the provided builders to be able to setup 
> properly. I'm looking at the InitialContent [1] and the CugConfiguration [2] 
> in the context of installing node types.
> I would like to look into removing the hardcoded providers and trying to run 
> all existing editors over the content produced by the initializers.
> [0] 
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/Oak.java#L687
>  
> [1] 
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/InitialContent.java#L134
> [2] 
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-authorization-cug/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/spi/security/authorization/cug/impl/CugConfiguration.java#L162



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to