[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16520098#comment-16520098
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on OAK-7410:
--------------------------------------
I agree with your proposal Thomas.
The differences between oak-search and oak-lucene versions of
IndexDefinitionBuilder were intentional because not everything in Lucene makes
sense in an "abstract" definition.
So I'd be + 1 for encapsulating IDB within a LuceneIDB.
> Define SPIs for Oak Search module
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-7410
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7410
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Technical task
> Reporter: Tommaso Teofili
> Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.9.3
>
> Attachments: AggregateGenerics.patch
>
>
> Abstract IndexEditor and QueryIndex implementations and SPIs should be
> created for Oak Search module.
> Those classes should be then reused / extended by implementors in and outside
> Oak .
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
