[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16523484#comment-16523484
]
Marcel Reutegger edited comment on OAK-7570 at 6/26/18 9:33 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
[~mduerig], what's your view on the proposed changes to the NodeStore
implementations? E.g. in the
[SegmentNodeStore|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/88/files#diff-b807d5209750e2c38ab6003f41c4a3e6]
and how the feature introduces interfaces throughout the stack/layers.
was (Author: mreutegg):
[~mduerig], what's your view on the proposed changes to the NodeStore
implementations. E.g. in the
[SegmentNodeStore|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/88/files#diff-b807d5209750e2c38ab6003f41c4a3e6]
and how the feature introduces interfaces throughout the stack/layers.
> [DirectBinaryAccess][DISCUSS] Client access via DataStoreBlobStore directly
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-7570
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7570
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Technical task
> Components: blob-plugins
> Reporter: Matt Ryan
> Assignee: Matt Ryan
> Priority: Major
>
> Open discussion related to OAK-7569:
> The [original pull request|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/88]
> proposes changes to oak-api, oak-segment-tar, oak-store-document, oak-core,
> and oak-jcr as well as oak-blob-plugins, oak-blob-cloud, and oak-blob-azure.
> Would it be possible / better to keep the changes local to the oak-blob-*
> bundles and avoid making changes throughout the stack?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
