[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17437972#comment-17437972
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-9401:
-------------------------------------

[~mreutegg] - any idea why the "candidate_oak_1_8" label was removed but not 
"candidate_oak_1_6"?

> Breaking recovery lock issue
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-9401
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9401
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: documentmk
>            Reporter: José Andrés Cordero Benítez
>            Assignee: Marcel Reutegger
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: candidate_oak_1_6
>             Fix For: 1.40.0, 1.22.8
>
>
> There won't be a leaseEndTime when the recovering clusterId, the one referred 
> to in {{recoveryBy}}, is not active anymore. The implementation of 
> {{RecoveryLock.tryBreakRecoveryLock()}} should only call 
> {{getLeaseEndTime()}} when {{recovering.isActive()}} is true.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to