[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17438520#comment-17438520
 ] 

Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-9401:
---------------------------------------

Hmm, to me it looks like I mistakingly removed candidate_oak_1_8 instead of 
candidate_oak_1_22 when I merged the fix into the 1.22 branch. I'm going to add 
candidate_oak_1_8 again.

> Breaking recovery lock issue
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-9401
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9401
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: documentmk
>            Reporter: José Andrés Cordero Benítez
>            Assignee: Marcel Reutegger
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: candidate_oak_1_6
>             Fix For: 1.40.0, 1.22.8
>
>
> There won't be a leaseEndTime when the recovering clusterId, the one referred 
> to in {{recoveryBy}}, is not active anymore. The implementation of 
> {{RecoveryLock.tryBreakRecoveryLock()}} should only call 
> {{getLeaseEndTime()}} when {{recovering.isActive()}} is true.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to