> It seemed to me that the original request might be more easily (if > only partially?) satisfied by creating an "implementation guidelines" > document, to which the different library implementers might submit > their "gotchas" and where we could agree "best practices" (not yet > mandatory) such as the ones suggested by JR, and help those who are > implementing their own libraries.
I'm all for pragmatism, but this is slightly disheartening. If the spec is tight enough, why the need for "implementation guidelines" and "gotchas" and "best practices"? If we're too far from a RI, then that IMO points at the spec not being good enough from this point of view, and we're looking for quick and dirty fixes. An attempt at an RI would certainly help IETF-bound people and organizations, too. Hans --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
