On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:36 AM, rawc <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see a huge problem with the 'request token' phrasing > (especially since it is clearly described in the spec) and > 'intermediate token' probably wouldn't make things any more clear as > to the function of the token. If it was changed, though, you could do > something similar to Kerberos and call it a 'token granting > token'...kind of like the Kerberos 'ticket granting ticket' (TGT).
It's not really similar to a kerberos TGT. A kerberos TGT gets you automatic authentication to all services, which is nowhere near what an OAuth request token does. I think "initialization token" might work. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
