I'm not sure it would make more sense, but I think we need a better reason to change it. There are existing implementations that would be incompatible with a different separator.
On Mar 16, 11:10 am, Allen Tom <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a quick question about the Problem Reporting Extension regarding > the parameter_absent problem. The spec says that missing parameters > should be listed in the oauth_parameter_absent parameter, using & to > separate multiple parameters. > > Would it make more sense to use commas to separate multiple values? > Using commas to separate multiple values would make the > oauth_parameter_absent parameter consistent with mutivalued URL query > parameters. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
