We opted to implement DraftHammer r10 - as it seemed to be a nice balance between 1.0a and the changes coming in 2.0 - although the whole state-of-the-spec thing is horrible!
On 8 June 2010 14:12, Shak <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm about to start working on incorporating OAuth in a project I'm > working on. I'll be a resource server, and will therefore have to > issue and manage tokens etc. > > My question is regarding OAuth 2. Should I look to support the new > spec? I realise that it's a draft and in flux etc, but I'm wondering > with regards to this new project whether it's better to jump straight > into 2 now, or use 1a with the intention of moving to 2 later on - I > understand that the two are not compatible, but is it possible to run > both in parallel? Perhaps even by using the same tokens? > > I know that this is a very subjective question to ask, but any > thoughts or advice would be appreciated. > > Shak > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OAuth" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <oauth%[email protected]>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.
