Apologies, could you explain or provide a resource that explains what DraftHammer is?
On Jun 8, 4:15 pm, Lee Hambley <[email protected]> wrote: > We opted to implement DraftHammer r10 - as it seemed to be a nice balance > between 1.0a and the changes coming in 2.0 - although the whole > state-of-the-spec thing is horrible! > > On 8 June 2010 14:12, Shak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I'm about to start working on incorporating OAuth in a project I'm > > working on. I'll be a resource server, and will therefore have to > > issue and manage tokens etc. > > > My question is regarding OAuth 2. Should I look to support the new > > spec? I realise that it's a draft and in flux etc, but I'm wondering > > with regards to this new project whether it's better to jump straight > > into 2 now, or use 1a with the intention of moving to 2 later on - I > > understand that the two are not compatible, but is it possible to run > > both in parallel? Perhaps even by using the same tokens? > > > I know that this is a very subjective question to ask, but any > > thoughts or advice would be appreciated. > > > Shak > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "OAuth" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] <oauth%[email protected]>. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.
