Hopefully by 1.0 you mean draft-hammer-oauth, not the community edition with its "Consumer Key" and other inventions.
EHL From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Recordon Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 10:35 PM To: Peter Saint-Andre; Luke Shepard Cc: OAuth WG Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] terminology Hey Peter, Luke put together a spreadsheet comparing the terminology across five or six different protocols. Hopefully he'll share it. :) I have a pretty strong preference of sticking with OAuth 1.0 terminology as much as possible. --David On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: One of the topics discussed during our conference call last week was the matter of terminology. All agreed that we need to gain clarity and consensus regarding the terms we use. To help us achieve that, I've created a stub wiki page: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/oauth/trac/wiki/OauthTerms If you don't yet have a wiki account, please go here: http://tools.ietf.org/newlogin Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
