On 2/2/10 3:12 PM, Dick Hardt wrote: > > On 2010-02-02, at 2:08 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 1/28/10 11:35 PM, David Recordon wrote: >>> I have a pretty strong preference of sticking with OAuth 1.0 >>> terminology as much as possible. >> >> Agreed. > > The term "server" in OAuth 1.0 does not differentiate between the > Authorization Server and Protected Resource as are differentiated in > OAuth WRAP. > > The terms used in OAuth WRAP are a superset of OAuth 1.0 with changes > to provide additional clarity.
I meant to say "agreed, where possible and reasonable". The point of this exercise is to make sure that we differentiate where that makes sense. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
