I propose alter the spec so that the token responses are encoded with
application/x-www-form-urlencoded, matching OAuth 1.0. I also propose moving
the JSON and XML support for these responses to an extension.

I haven't heard an argument that convinces me that JSON adds anything over
application/x-www-form-urlencoded. It seems to be a preference and as such
can be accommodated as an extension. Thoughts?
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to