+1 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Moore Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 8:06 AM To: OAuth WG Subject: [OAUTH-WG] application/x-www-form-urlencoded Counterproposal
I propose alter the spec so that the token responses are encoded with application/x-www-form-urlencoded, matching OAuth 1.0. I also propose moving the JSON and XML support for these responses to an extension. I haven't heard an argument that convinces me that JSON adds anything over application/x-www-form-urlencoded. It seems to be a preference and as such can be accommodated as an extension. Thoughts?
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
