I am looking forward to the extension mechanism. Is it coming in draft
10?
=nat @ Tokyo via iPhone
On 2010/06/16, at 11:52, Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]> wrote:
There is nothing in the spec to prevent other parameters. There will
be specific methods to extend the protocol.
EHL
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Nat Sakimura
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 6:27 PM
To: oauth
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] 4.2 Access Token Response in draft 8
It is my understanding that access token response may contain other
parameters than what is stated there.
Sometimes, mutually understanding server and client may want to
exchange other parameters on top of it and is legitimate, IMHO.
Is this understanding correct?
--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
http://twitter.com/_nat_en
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
