-09 -----Original Message----- From: Nat [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 8:08 PM To: Eran Hammer-Lahav Cc: oauth Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] 4.2 Access Token Response in draft 8
I am looking forward to the extension mechanism. Is it coming in draft 10? =nat @ Tokyo via iPhone On 2010/06/16, at 11:52, Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]> wrote: > There is nothing in the spec to prevent other parameters. There will > be specific methods to extend the protocol. > > EHL > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Nat Sakimura > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 6:27 PM > To: oauth > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] 4.2 Access Token Response in draft 8 > > It is my understanding that access token response may contain other > parameters than what is stated there. > Sometimes, mutually understanding server and client may want to > exchange other parameters on top of it and is legitimate, IMHO. > > Is this understanding correct? > > > -- > Nat Sakimura (=nat) > http://www.sakimura.org/en/ > http://twitter.com/_nat_en > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
