On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]> wrote: > The only change I'm aligned with is being more specific about repeating > parameters > and potentially allowing the assertion parameter to repeat. That's it for the > core spec.
Thanks for clarifying that Eran. That's the only change I was suggesting here. And if others think it's too complicated, I'm not married to it. Just seemed like a potentially useful thing. > The SAML spec should be more specific about allowing or not multiple > assertions for the given type URI. Yes, and it will be. _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
