Thanks Mike. How are you going to show the scheme name? bearer, Bearer, BEARER, ...? It is case-insensitive but want to be consistent.
EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Jones [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 9:46 AM > To: Marius Scurtescu; Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: OAuth WG > Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token type and scheme name (deadline: > 2/10) > > I'm likewise OK with #1. As I'd written previously, I wasn't religious about > the > name "OAuth2"; I was for it for to be consistent with past drafts and so as > not > to introduce a breaking change. Given that there appears to be consensus to > make a change, I'll plan on publishing a draft later this week that contains > it > unless discussion in the next few days convinces us that we should follow a > different course. > > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Marius Scurtescu > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 9:24 AM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: OAuth WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token type and scheme name (deadline: > 2/10) > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Mike, Brian, Dirk, and Marius - can you live with #1? > > Works for me. > > Marius > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
