It will be either OAuth2Bearer or Bearer, depending upon the outcome of the
vote just sent to the list.
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 2:48 PM
To: Mike Jones; Marius Scurtescu
Cc: OAuth WG
Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token type and scheme name (deadline: 2/10)
Thanks Mike.
How are you going to show the scheme name? bearer, Bearer, BEARER, ...? It is
case-insensitive but want to be consistent.
EHL
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Jones [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 9:46 AM
> To: Marius Scurtescu; Eran Hammer-Lahav
> Cc: OAuth WG
> Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token type and scheme name (deadline:
> 2/10)
>
> I'm likewise OK with #1. As I'd written previously, I wasn't
> religious about the name "OAuth2"; I was for it for to be consistent
> with past drafts and so as not to introduce a breaking change. Given
> that there appears to be consensus to make a change, I'll plan on
> publishing a draft later this week that contains it unless discussion
> in the next few days convinces us that we should follow a different course.
>
> -- Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Marius Scurtescu
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 9:24 AM
> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
> Cc: OAuth WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token type and scheme name (deadline:
> 2/10)
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Mike, Brian, Dirk, and Marius - can you live with #1?
>
> Works for me.
>
> Marius
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
