Unfortunately neither solution suggested so far is acceptable. So a vote from 
my perspective is premature.

I'd like to keep working for a new solution.

Phil
[email protected]




On 2011-04-01, at 10:51 AM, Oleg Gryb wrote:

> It's a very interesting discussion and I think, I understand both parties 
> well because consider myself belonging to both communities (enterprise and 
> networking). Still, I would vote in favor of MUST.
> 
> Considering the big size of this mailing list and the big level of engagement 
> of its members, why don't we vote?
> 
> The results of the vote should be taken into consideration by those who 
> writes the final version.
> 
> From: Francisco Corella <[email protected]>
> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email protected]>; Mark Mcgloin 
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: OAuth WG <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Sent: Fri, April 1, 2011 9:22:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authorization code security issue (reframed)
> 
> > So we have 2 different communities of Oauth developers that
> > will never agree.
> > 
> > SHOULD: Typically the social networking sites that need to
> > cater for tail end developers by not enforcing TLS on
> > redirect_uri. It is a risk to think that using strong
> > language in the spec will help them appreciate the issues
> > MUST: Typically enterprise organisations (I am in this
> > camp). They can enforce indirectly by only supporting
> > registered callback urls and ensure those use TLS
> 
> Security is at least as necessary to social networking sites
> as to enterprise sites.  Think about what this means for
> Facebook.  If you are using Wifi in a cafe and use the
> Facebook login button to log in to any application, a hacker
> can easily impersonate you.
> 
> By the way, is somebody from Facebook reading this?  If so,
> this is a vulnerability that Facebook has right now, and you
> should do something about it.  At the very least you should
> change the examples of redirect URIs in the developer
> documentation so that they use https rather than http.
> 
> Francisco
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to