Thanks folks for your work in updating the charter. I'll take a peek at this and get back about getting it put in place in the next few days.
S. On 09/05/11 15:29, Barry Leiba wrote: > David says... >> Hey Barry, I'm confused. This thread is full of comments. Is there an >> updated charter which addresses them? > > Well, your earlier message doesn't suggest any changes, nor does > Dick's. Thomas's does, but he retracted them after he understood the > purpose of this rechartering (see below). So there aren't as many > comments in this thread as you think. I did, however miss Eran's > comments (so sorry!), but I think Hannes picked those up in his > update, posted after mine. > > Igor, on the use cases: The point of this rechartering is to focus > tightly on getting the base protocol done Very Soon. I agree with you > that a use-cases document would be great to publish, and if that's > kept current with any new discussions here it should be easy to pop it > out right away after the next recharter. But we (and the ADs) don't > want to have any distractions from getting OAuth 2.0 out. > > I don't think this will really be an issue. If "use cases" is about > ready to go, then it will go out very quickly afterward, and all will > be well. > > For the ADs, I'm attaching Hannes's updated version of the charter for > you to proceed with. > > Barry, as chair > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
