I don't see why we can't just publish this document as an informational RFC now. I sure hope we are not going to accommodate any new use cases...
Also, since this is not a normative document, the WG value here is minimal. I think Igor can move forward with publishing this as an individual submission, but will also be supportive of making it a working group item and quickly moving to final WG LC and off to the IESG. EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Igor Faynberg > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 12:18 PM > To: Barry Leiba > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Revised Charter > > Barry, > > I agree. Indeed, after ascertaining that the next rechartering is scheduled > for > October, I personally see no problem with deferring the use cases. (I thought > that the current rechartering was already post-2.0, which is what had > confused me.) > > With thanks for thorough follow-ups, > > Igor > > Barry Leiba wrote: > > ... > > > > Igor, on the use cases: The point of this rechartering is to focus > > tightly on getting the base protocol done Very Soon. I agree with you > > that a use-cases document would be great to publish, and if that's > > kept current with any new discussions here it should be easy to pop it > > out right away after the next recharter. But we (and the ADs) don't > > want to have any distractions from getting OAuth 2.0 out. > > > > . > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
