As editor of the Oauth Bearer spec, I believe that these comments have been well understood and considered by the working group. I do understand that the working group's consensus position is different than Julian's. See these notes documenting that this is the case:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08113.html https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08116.html https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08121.html Best wishes, -- Mike -----Original Message----- From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julian Reschke Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 7:58 AM To: i...@ietf.org Cc: The IESG; oauth@ietf.org; IETF-Announce Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-15.txt> (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol: Bearer Tokens) to Proposed Standard On 2012-01-23 16:46, The IESG wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from the Web Authorization Protocol WG > (oauth) to consider the following document: > - 'The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol: Bearer Tokens' > <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-15.txt> as a Proposed Standard ... Please see my comments in <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08120.html> which I think have not been addressed. Best regards, Julian _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
